I'm really sad about this seat. I've flown it on BA, and while it's heaps and heaps better than BA's 90s-era climb-over-or-be-climbed-over seats, that's a super low bar. Sure, these seats have a so-called "privacy door," but it's a checkbox item: there only so a box can be checked. The walls and ...

If the software is unreliable at quantities above 330ml, why revert all the way back to 100ml maximum and out of one's bags? Why not instead impose a limit of, say, 200 ml and allow them to remain in baggage?

Is there a typo? "...Accenture then spent $60 million of taxpayer’s money across a staggering three years to develop the Digital Passenger Declaration platform, including a reported $75 million going towards just the smartphone app...." How can $60 million over three years (average ...

If the software issue makes the machines unreliable at quantities above 350ml, why go back to the old 100ml and out of the baggage rules? Why not allow quantities up to, say, 200ml and let people not take them out?

Multiple operators examining scans is a good idea. I know many systems (such as in LHR) have each tray barcoded, so an operator flags a tray and indicates what needs to be checked, then a different agent grabs the tray and checks it. (Not that I'd ever suggest LHR has good security, it's horrible.)